Explain why the syllogisms are sound and which are not


Discussion Post

Consider the following arguments

All chickens have feathers.
This animal has feathers.
Therefore, this animal is a chicken.
All chickens are green.
No green birds eat pickles.
Therefore, no chickens eat pickles.
All chickens are mortal.
My pet bird Gilda is a chicken.
Therefore, Gilda is mortal.
All chickens are birds.
All ducks are birds.
Therefore, all chickens are ducks.
Floyd is a rooster.
A rooster is a male chicken.
Therefore, Floyd is a chicken.

Task

1) Which of these syllogisms is valid? Explain why these syllogisms are valid and which are not. For the invalid syllogisms, include the reason(s) for the non-valid structure.

2) Which of these syllogisms is sound? Explain why these syllogisms are sound and which are not. For the unsound syllogisms, include the reason(s) for the unsound structure.

The response must include a reference list. One-inch margins, double-space, Using Times New Roman 12 pnt font and APA style of writing and citations.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Explain why the syllogisms are sound and which are not
Reference No:- TGS03180852

Expected delivery within 24 Hours