Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and


Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

Please follow guidelines exactly as shown below in order of the paper.

1. Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position.

2. Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.

3. Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response.

4. Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.

Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment.

Note: Wikipedia and similar type Websites do not qualify as academic resources. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student's name, the professor's name, the course title, and the date.

The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Dissertation: Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and
Reference No:- TGS02752145

Expected delivery within 24 Hours