Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and


Assignment: Criminal Conduct and Criminal Law

Criminal laws regulate human conduct and tell people what they can and cannot do and, in some instances, what they must do under certain circumstances. In this assignment, you will explore different types of criminal conduct and the goals of criminal law.

Write a four to six (4-6) page paper in which you:

Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actus rea. Provide a rationale to support your position.

Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.

Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response.

Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.

Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and
Reference No:- TGS01033683

Expected delivery within 24 Hours