Problem 1. Logan and Kae are partners living in California. Logan is from Canada and Kae is from Mexico. After a nasty breakup, Kae moves to New York City and Logan travels to Costa Rica where Logan purchases a French-made bottle of wine and laces it with arsenic (a legal but deadly poison) made in a German lab. Logan mails the poisoned wine with a note saying they are sorry to Kae, who drinks it all and promptly dies. Looking only at the "Territorial Principle" of jurisdiction, which states have a claim to jurisdiction to prosecute Logan's crimes? For each, simply state the name of the country and which of the two sub-principles of the territorial principle apply. No explanation is needed. You will lose marks for naming states that do not have a territorial claim to jurisdiction on this crime.
Problem 2. Same scenario, but name the other states that have a claim to jurisdiction to prosecute this crime and the principle of jurisdiction that supports their claim. You do not need to explain why, just list each state and the name of the principle that gives them a claim to jurisdiction. Same scenario: Logan and Kae are partners living in California. Logan is from Canada and Kae is from Mexico. After a nasty breakup, Kae moves to New York City and Logan travels to Costa Rica where Logan purchases a French-made bottle of wine and laces it with arsenic (a legal but deadly poison) made in a German lab. Logan mails the poisoned wine with a note saying they are sorry to Kae, who drinks it all and promptly dies.