"Translating Policy Arguments" Please respond to the following:
Explain at least two key factors policy makers use when evaluating and using information provided to them in policy reports. Explain why it is important for an analyst to know how policy makers evaluate and use information.
From the case study, Case 9:1, highlight two key components a structured written narrative for a policy issue paper or policy memo. Then propose at least two benefits of developing a policy argument in this way. Provide an example to support your response.
Policy Memo on the U.S. Invasion of IRAQ
The question has been raised whether the Senate should authorize the use of force under the Dole-Warner resolution. This analysis considers a number of perspectives to determine whether to support or reject this claim.
One reason to accept that the Senate should authorize the use of force under the Dole-Warner resolution is the suggestion that the Dole-Warner resolution is justified by UN Securiy Council Resolution 678 of November 29, 1990. This reason is supported by the fact that Resolution 678 authorizes U.S. military intervention in Kuwait. An objection to the claim that the Dole-Warner resolution is justified by UN Securiy Council Resolution 678 of November 29, 1990, is that the resolution is an artificial creation of the president and no vital interests are at stake.
Another reason to believe that the Senate should authorize the use of force under the Dole-Warner resolution is that Iraq is a securiy threat to the region and the world. This is based on the idea that Iraq has a large military and regional political aspirations.
Attachment:- case 91.rar