Expansionary policy or contractionary policy


The information below illustrates the situation in 2010 and 2011 if Fed does not use the monetary policy: 

Year Potential Real GDP    Real GDP    Price Level
2010    $14 trillion    $14 trillion    120
2011    $15 trillion    $15.2 trillion 133

Question 1: If Fed wants to keep real GDP at its potential level in 2011 should it use expansionary policy  or a contractionary policy?  Should Fed NY sell or buy T' bills?  How about Fed Dallas and Fed Philadelphia, are they expected to sell or buy T bills? 

Question 2: If the Fed's policy in keeping real GDP at its potential in 2011, state whether each of the  following will be higher, lower, or the same as it would have been if the Fed had taken no action:

a. Real  GDP; 
b. Potential  GDP; 
c. The  inflation  rate;
d. The  unemployment  rate 

Question 3: Draw an aggregate demand and aggregate supply  graph to illustrate your answer. Be sure that your graph contains LRAS curves for 2010 and 2011; SRAS curves for 2010 and 2011;  AD curves for 2010 and 2011, with and without monetary policy action; and equilibrium real GDP and price level in 2011 with and without policy.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Macroeconomics: Expansionary policy or contractionary policy
Reference No:- TGS01746112

Now Priced at $25 (50% Discount)

Recommended (90%)

Rated (4.3/5)