Assignment:
The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between employee burnout and retention among human resource professionals and to explore the organizational factors that contribute to burnout and influence employees' decisions to remain in or leave the HR profession. Need Assignment Help?
Overview:
Based on the problem statement that you submitted in Week 6, you will take the next step in this assignment-to find out what is already known about your topic. If the feedback you received on your Week 6 assignment enables you to improve your problem statement, make those changes first, and begin your work on this assignment with your revised problem statement. The problem statement helps you frame the introduction to your review of the literature and should be incorporated within your introduction, though it will need to be adjusted to flow with your narrative.
The literature review is a key step in research in psychology: the point at which you summarize the state of what is known in your topic area and highlight what remains to be learned. You are identifying a gap in the current literature and your proposed study will focus on examining this gap. The Chapter 2 literature review that you complete for your dissertation will provide the primary evidence to support the importance of your dissertation topic. The word "review" may not communicate the full process involved. A well-developed literature review does review the research that has been completed in a particular topic area. However, it also synthesizes the results of that literature by common themes found among the research articles and attempts to paint a clear picture of the state of knowledge on that subject.
Even if you began working on this assignment during Week 6, you would have had only two weeks to complete it. For that reason, this assignment is called a mini literature review. As you will see when you examine the Mini Literature Review Scoring Guide, the expectation is that you have made a solid first attempt. That means three things:
1. You have made good use of the feedback you received on previous assignments to further focus and clarify your problem statement.
2. You have clearly identified what you consider to be the five most significant recent scholarly sources in your topic and problem area.
3. You have digested these sources thoroughly enough to be able to synthesize their content into a coherent statement of the current knowledge in your problem area.
Your mini literature review need not be perfect or completely comprehensive. However, it should demonstrate your beginning mastery of these aspects of the doctoral research thinking process.
Instructions:
For this assignment:
? Strive for clarity and conciseness in your problem statement. Knowing exactly what you seek is the best way to focus your search productively. Before returning to the Capella library to continue your search for scholarly sources, carefully review the feedback you received on your two earlier assignments (Research Topic Investigation and Problem Statement). Use the feedback you received from your instructor to tighten and clarify your problem statement.
? Review the sources you have already found on your topic, including the ones you found for your Week 4 assignment, and refine your list of keywords that will help you focus your search productively. If you need some help with this process, review the resource Get Critical Search Skills.
? Continue your search, looking for those sources that seem to most clearly address the topic and problem area you chose. As you review a potential resource, first read the abstract. Then, if you are not sure how valuable that source will be, skim the article to identify the key points and evidence provided. In this manner, begin compiling your list of potential sources. You may need to consider at least 20-25 sources before you can come up with the five you need to represent current knowledge in your topic area.
? Read the articles in depth, starting with those you believe most directly address your problem area. For a method to accomplish this process, review the Locating Common Themes in a Literature Review presentation. You may want to use the Capellapillar process described in that piece.
? Look at the results of your reading (or your Capellapillar, if you used that approach). After analyzing the various points of view, synthesize the ideas to create as clear a picture as possible of what you believe to be the current status of knowledge in your topic and problem area. Be clear about what is known and what questions remain.
Writing Your Mini Literature Review
1. Write a clear introduction that incorporates your problem statement.
2. Describe each of the major viewpoints you encountered in the literature by common themes found among the research articles. Under each themed heading, compare and contrast the differing viewpoints, pointing out ideas that appear to be shared, as well as those areas where different authors advanced different perspectives. Then, aggregate the research and write a brief synthesis segment.
3. Write your conclusion.
? In this case, it is only a statement of what you perceive as not yet known or examined, sometimes referred to as a "gap in our knowledge on the topic." (By the way, there is a difference between what you know about a topic versus what the field has in the literature about a topic. It is easy to confuse the two.) Then write a creative summary of the state of knowledge on your topic by using critical thinking approaches you have learned in this course. In addition, your conclusion must include an explanation of why it is important to study this topic, which reiterates the justification for your study.
¦ Because your literature review comes before research is conducted, you do not yet have any conclusion from your own proposed research, only a statement of what is and is not known, based on past research.
4. List your references according to APA format standards.
Notes:
Please note that:
? The mini literature review does not contain a Methods section because you have not yet conducted research.
? The resources you list as references should include those you identified in your research topic investigation for the Week 4 assignment. As a result, you have already completed a significant part of the search for resources.
Additional Requirements:
Your assignment should meet the following requirements:
? Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
? APA formatting: Format resources and citations according to APA style and format guidelines. Note that this means you must include separate title, abstract, and references pages.
? Number of resources: Include a minimum of five scholarly resources.
? Length of paper: Write a minimum of five typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page, abstract, or references page.
? Font and font size: Use Times New Roman, 12 point.
Review the Mini Literature Review Scoring for more information on how you will be assessed.
Submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word attachment in the assignment area.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Apply advanced critical thinking skills.
- State a specific problem in your specialization of interest to be investigated and its importance to the field.
Competency 2: Apply research processes and standards and the technical skills of a researcher in the field of psychology.
- Synthesize the results of credible research to summarize the current state of knowledge on the specific problem.
Competency 3: Analyze and apply professional ethical standards in psychological research and practice.
- Compare the viewpoints of the identified problem as they are presented in scholarly literature.
Competency 4: Develop a professional identity as a doctoral-level psychologist.
- Identify five scholarly sources that provide the current knowledge base of a specific problem.
Competency 5: Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.
- Convey purpose in a well-organized text, incorporating appropriate evidence and tone in grammatically sound sentences.
- Apply APA style and formatting to scholarly writing.