Even though the rusting problem was a recurrent one of


Question: Steven Taterka purchased a 1972 Ford Mustang from a Ford dealer in January 1972. In October 1974, after Taterka had put 75,000 miles on the car and Ford's express warranty had expired, he discovered that the taillight assembly gaskets on his Mustang had been installed in such a way that water was permitted to enter the taillight assembly, causing rust to form. Even though the rusting problem was a recurrent one of which Ford was aware, Ford did nothing for Taterka. Was Ford liable to Taterka under the implied warranty of merchantability?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Management Theories: Even though the rusting problem was a recurrent one of
Reference No:- TGS02453582

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (90%)

Rated (4.3/5)