Evaluate the van itallie vs franklin lakes


Discussion:

1. Authority and Misconduct

Despite widespread cynicism about public ethics, students are likely to agree that a rule of law depends on the perceived legitimacy of public officials and that legitimacy is impossible without widespread ethical behavior. Discuss with supporting example what can be done to cultivate ethical behavior in public officials.

Take a position on whether or not behavior should be governed by compliance with rules. Support your position with examples or evidence.

2. Public Ethics Laws

After reading the case summary, People v. Howard, if you were an Illinois state legislator, would you support a bill in response to People v. Howard that provides that only conduct specifically prescribed by a state statute may be a predicate offense for official misconduct? Why or why not?

Evaluate Van Itallie v. Franklin Lakes. Based on the facts described in Van Itallie v. Franklin Lakes, take a position and explain what you would have done differently, if anything, if you were the council members.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Other Subject: Evaluate the van itallie vs franklin lakes
Reference No:- TGS02111620

Now Priced at $30 (50% Discount)

Recommended (98%)

Rated (4.3/5)