Please provide 2 different answers for each question with a minimum of 100 words.
1) If a public relations professional becomes aware of some harmful outcomes of his or her efforts, should he or she attempt to improve conditions or blow the whistle, even if it means some of the other good outcomes may be negated? How would you go about making this ethical choice?
2) Some might support the idea that public relations specialists' first duty is to their employer. Others would suggest that public relations specialists be true to universal ethical ideas. Which do you think is closer to the truth? Why?
3) Is there an ethical rationale whereby nonprofit organizations could have for-profit ventures without first informing the public? If so, what is it? If not, why not?