• DuBois vacillates between praise and criticism of Washington. Is this an effective rhetorical device? Why or Why not?
(if you are not sure what 'vacillates' means or what a 'rhetorical device' is, please Google it!)
Explain and support your answer with a minimum of 250 words; response should offer a minimum of five assertions to support your position supported by elaborating details and textual integration. (The emphasis of your response should be on whether the vacillation is an effective rhetorical device, not on retelling what Dubois or Washington has written. For example, your topic sentence should be DuBois' vacillation between praise and criticism of Washington is / is not (choose one) an effective rhetorical device. The rest of your post should offer reasons why or why not). Again, DO NOT explain what DuBois talks about / what he says about Washington; DO NOT explain how he praises and criticizes Washington. Instead you are to explain whether or not the vacillation between praise and criticism is effective.