Problem: Drawing on the insights from the Exit, Voice, and Loyalty game examined in Chapter 3 of your textbook (Clark et al 2017) , what can we infer when we see states ignoring the demands of their citizens? For example, if we know that the government of country A does not treat its citizens well and we see that the average citizen still stays in the country, what can we infer about the strategic relationship between the state and its citizens? Group of answer choices That the citizens have no exit threat and that the state (Kim Jong - Il) depends on the citizens. That the citizens do have a credible exit threat and that the state depends on the citizens. That the citizens do have a credible exit threat and that the state is autonomous. We can't assume anything about whether the citizens have a credible e xit threat but we can assume that the state is autonomous. We can't assume anything about whether the state is autonomous or dependent, but we can assume that the citizens do not have a credible exit threat. Need Assignment Help?