Write a 5-page, double spaced (12 point font), well-crafted essay (excluding the cover page and references) that analyzes the claims in the case. The paper should be between 1,250 and 1500 words long. Structure your paper with these major headings, bolded:
Introduction
Explanation of the issue or problem
Analysis of the information
Analysis of alternative viewpoints, conclusions, or solutions
SEE--
https://www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/ethical-decision-making/thinking-ethically/
Personal or summarized conclusions and proposed decisions
Conclusion
Follow these guidelines:
• Use the Critical Thinking Rubric to guide your analysis.
• Draw in references from outside resources related to the topic to support your conclusions or proposed decisions.
• Employ APA style for format and citation guidance.
Remember: Even though I have suggested the major headings for your short paper, you should still follow best practices for structuring the paper.
• An effective introduction grabs the reader's attention and sets the tone and direction for the rest of the paper. In reading an introduction, the reader should have a clear idea of what will follow. Supporting paragraphs move the reader from the general introduction to the more specific aspects of your analysis in the paper.
• The body paragraphs show how the information you are providing supports and relates to your thinking. Even though you've provided the title for each section, paragraphs across and within sections need to effectively transition from one to the next.
• Each paragraph should include a topic sentence, which contains the main point of the paragraph.
• The conclusion (#6) brings to a close what you have presented in your paper.You have moved the reader from the general introduction ("The intent of this paper is to critically analyze...) to the specific supporting paragraphs (the details under headings #2-5), and now to the conclusion, which briefly summarizes the issue or intent and restates the main points of your analysis ("detailed analysis of the issue of ... resulted in conclusions that indicate... and suggest proposed decisions to...").