Does trosper seem to have a prima facie case of retaliatory


Question: Trosper filed a complaint alleging the following: Bag ‘N Save employed her as a"deli manager." During the course of her employment, she suffered a work-related injury which required medical treatment. When she reported her injury to her employers, the company demoted her from "deli manager" to "deli clerk," and her annual salary decreased from $30,100 to $22,500. Trosper's complaint does not allege that she filed for workers' compensation. Bag ‘N Save, however, acknowledges that Trosper filed a workers'compensation claim and that she reported the injury under the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Act. Does Trosper seem to have a prima facie case of retaliatory demotion? What legitimate business reasons might the company have for demoting Trosper in the wake of her injuries? If the company has mixed motives in demoting her, what should be the result? See Trosper v. Bag N Save [273 Neb. 855, 734 N.W.2d 704 (2007)].

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: Does trosper seem to have a prima facie case of retaliatory
Reference No:- TGS02497857

Now Priced at $15 (50% Discount)

Recommended (95%)

Rated (4.7/5)