Does Ex Parte Quirin justify the treatment of detainees at Guantanamo Bay?
Can you see a distinction between Quirin and his fellow "enemy combatants" and those detained at Guantanamo Bay?
How did the Second Circuit Court of Appeals distinguish them in Padilla v. Rumsfeld?
Is the distinction significant enough to make a difference in the constitutional justification for the rights afforded those detained at Guantanamo Bay?
Are there additional rights, besides trial by military tribunals, being denied detainees at Guantanamo Bay? What minimal rights did the Supreme Court give detainees in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld?
Address these questions in a paper of 8-10 pages, double-spaced, 12-pt., Times New Roman. Document your sources in APA style.