Problem
The 6th Amendment guarantees anyone being prosecuted for a crime the right to an impartial jury. The lawyers in the case can use two tools to pick the jury: challenges for cause and peremptory challenges. Challenges for cause must have a reason, such as a juror saying that he will have trouble being impartial, or a juror saying that he has special expertise that will get in the way of him analyzing the evidence (such as a juror who is a doctor in a case with medical evidence). Peremptory challenges can be for any reason, including the lawyer's hunches. The only limit to peremptory challenges is that they can't be based on race. Do you think there should be any other limits to peremptory challenges?