Do you think that parks should have been charged with a


Choose one of the options below for discussion. Be sure to elaborate and explain.

Rotten Food (United States v. Parks, p. 161)

Do you think that Parks should have been charged with a criminal offense when he was not directly running the warehouse where the contaminated food was stored? Should he be convicted when he did not intend to hurt anyone? Discuss why or why not. What precedent does the court rely on in this case?

For one of your posts, do a little exploring online and discuss another white-collar crime story in the news. Include one source, properly cited in APA format.

It's in the Mail (United States v. Cohen, p. 156) Note: As you can see the one that I chose is below which is United States versus Parks page 161. Please remember to do a little exploring online and discuss another white collar crime story, in the news include one source, properly cited in APA format.

Attachment:- CASE.rar

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: Do you think that parks should have been charged with a
Reference No:- TGS02144028

Now Priced at $25 (50% Discount)

Recommended (96%)

Rated (4.8/5)