Do you think that attorney representation in adr helps


Discussion Post

This lesson explored the types of ADR, the parties involved, and the challenges to success. Consider and comment on the following questions:

• Attorney representation is not typically required in ADR proceedings, but it is often recommended so that each party's interests are adequately defended. Yet, some of the key advantages to ADR over traditional litigation are simplicity and efficiency. Do you think that attorney representation in ADR helps or hurts? Why or why not?

• One of the challenges discussed in this week's lesson is that of emotion, pride, and ego impeding the ADR process. These factors are obviously present whether disputants are pursuing ADR or traditional litigation. Do you think they are more or less problematic in ADR? Do you think they are harderor easier to overcome in ADR? Explain your answers.

The response must include a reference list. One-inch margins, double-space, Using Times New Roman 12 pnt font and APA style of writing and citations.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Management: Do you think that attorney representation in adr helps
Reference No:- TGS03207195

Now Priced at $25 (50% Discount)

Recommended (93%)

Rated (4.5/5)