Do you believe the grooming code was substantially related


Problem

Case: Hayden Ex Rel. AH V. Greensburg Community School

• Under the equal protection clause, gender discrimination requires intermediate scrutiny. Do you believe the grooming code was "substantially related to an important state interest"? Why or why not?

• This case presents one of the few examples where a substantive due process claim alleges deprivation of a liberty interest. The term liberty is applied broadly in such cases. Are high school students entitled to liberty in the school setting? Why or why not?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Do you believe the grooming code was substantially related
Reference No:- TGS03231771

Expected delivery within 24 Hours