Jeff was driving his car in a careless way, failing to drive as a reasonably prudent person would under the circumstances. Rylee was crossing the street in a careless way, failing to cross as a reasonably prudent person would. Jeff struck and injured Rylee with the car Jeff was driving. At the trial, it was found that Jeff was 80 percent at fault and Rylee was 20 percent at fault. The injuries sustained amounted to $100,000. Explain how much, if any, Rylee would receive in a state that applied the contributory negligence rule. Do the same for a state that applied the pure comparative negligence rule and a state that applied the partial comparative negligence rule.