Do the authors arguments support their main

Question

Write an Article Critique of at least two pages (not including title and reference pages) on the article listed below:
Gilbert, R. (2007). To incinerate or not to incinerate. Alternatives Journal, 33(2/3), 47-49.

You can find this point-counterpoint article in the GreenFILE database of the CSU Online Library. The article presents
opposing arguments, made by Richard Gilbert and Mark Winfield, one in favor of incineration over landfilling and one
against. Your paper should address the following topics:

Describe three key arguments made by each author.

Do the authors' arguments support their main points?

What evidence from the textbook supports the main points of each author? You should include one reference to
the text for each side of the argument.

Which side do you support?

Be sure to back up your argument with at least one outside source.

All sources used, including the textbook, must be cited and referenced according to APA style.

Answer 1

Make an Article Critique of at least 2 pages (not as well as title and reference pages) on the article listed below: Gilbert, R. (2007). To incinerate or not to cremate. Alternatives Journal. You can discover this point-counterpoint article in the Green FILE database of the CSU Online Library. The article presents opposing arguments, made by Richard Gilbert and Mark Winfield, one in favor of incineration over land filling and one against. Your paper must address the subsequent issues: Explain 3 key arguments made via each author. Do the authors' arguments support their main points? What confirmation from the textbook supports the main points of each author? You must comprise one reference to the text for each side of the argument.