Distinction between diplomatic and legislative immunity


Assignment:

Create a four to six page paper in which you:

1. Determine whether or not a conviction is feasible when an alleged perpetrator does not have the required mens rea but has engaged in the actusrea. Provide a rationale to support your position.

2. Explain the distinction between diplomatic immunity and legislative immunity. Next, support or criticize the premise that diplomatic immunity is vital for Americans abroad.

3. Argue for or against the theory that the courts should not hold a defendant of questionable competency to the standard sentencing guidelines. Provide a rationale to support your response.

4. Identify the four (4) goals of criminal law, and discuss the manner in which these four (4) goals effectuate the purpose of protecting the public and preventing the conviction of innocent persons.

Use at least three (3) quality academic resources

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Distinction between diplomatic and legislative immunity
Reference No:- TGS02058383

Expected delivery within 24 Hours