Assignment:
Non-Parametric Statistics Assignment
Questions are taken directly from Brase, Brase, Dolor, and Seibert Chapter 8, pages 466. In case an eBook page number differs, the questions are listed below:
The most important questions in life usually cannot be answered with absolute certainty. Many important questions are answered by giving an estimate and a measure of confidence in the estimate. This was the focus of Chapter 7. However, sometimes important questions must be answered in a more straightforward manner by a simple yes or no. Hypothesis testing is the statistical process of answering questions with a straightforward yes or no and providing an estimate of the risk in accepting the answer.
1. Review and discuss Type I and Type II errors associated with hypothesis testing.
2. Review and discuss the level of significance and power of a statistical test.
3. The following statements are very important. Give them some careful thought and discuss them.
a. When we fail to reject the null hypothesis, we do not claim that it is absolutely true. We simply claim that at the given level of significance, the data were not sufficient to reject the null hypothesis.
b. When we accept the alternate hypothesis, we do not claim that the null hypothesis is absolutely false. We do claim that at the given level of significance, the data presented enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.
4. In the text, it is said that a statistical test is a package of five basic ingredients. List these ingredients, discuss them in class, and write a short description of how these ingredients relate to the above discussion questions.
5. As access to computers becomes more and more prevalent, we see the ????-value reported in hypothesis testing more frequently. Review the use of the ????-value in hypothesis testing. What is the difference between the level of significance of a test and the ????-value? Considering both the ????-value and level of significance, under what conditions do we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Need Assignment Help?
General Instructions:
As doctoral students, your assignments are expected to follow the principles of high-quality scientific standards and promote knowledge and understanding in the field of criminal justice. You should apply a rigorous and critical assessment of a body of theory and empirical research, articulating what is known about the phenomenon and ways to advance research about the topic under review. Research syntheses should identify significant variables, a systematic and reproducible search strategy, and a clear frame work for studies included in the larger analysis.
Assignments may be written in first person ("I").
All assignments should be clearly and concisely written, with technical material set off. Please do not use jargon, slang, idioms, colloquialisms, or bureaucratese. Use acronyms sparingly and spell them out the first time you use them. Please do not construct acronyms from phrases you repeat frequently in the text.
Structure of Assignment Paper:
For purposes of this assignment, there is no layout structure required as far as the setup of this paper, with one exception. I would appreciate it if you used separate headers for question 1 and question 2. Sub-headers are also allowed but not required. Questions should strive to be no less than 250 words each with no maximum limit.
I expect all papers to be in the latest APA edition, properly cited, and all tables attached.
Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.