Problem
Raimondi (2014) proposes an enactive account of the relation of language to social cognition, based on the earlier theories of Humberto Maturana. His theory is critical not only of the mentalist assumptions inherent in traditional cognitivist approaches, but also of Tomasello's social pragmatic theory of language and social cognition.
Discuss how Raimondi challenges Tomasello's claim that a biologically inherited ability for 'intention-reading' ontogenetically precedes language. Start by discussing what, in the enactive account, operationally constitutes language.