Discuss history of corporate business crime enforcement


Assignment task:

Moral hazard" exists where there is a misalignment of incentives between those with a capacity to create risks and those likely to bear the costs of such risk taking.  While most Americans presumably are not aware of this somewhat obscure term, the phenomenon itself is pretty obvious (as well as terrifying with respect to COVID -19 vaccination and climate change).

Moral hazard can also pose a significant challenge to promoting compliance and ethics. That is, the law provides for large fines for organizations convicted of federal offenses, but those who bear the brunt of such punishments (mostly the shareholders) are often different than the individuals who benefit from the wrongdoing (usually the executives or other high-ranking personnel).

The history of corporate business crime enforcement is, in part, an effort to close this moral hazard gap.

The latest page in this history was written recently by Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco  at the Keynote Address at the ABA's 36th National Institute on White Collar Crime:

"To hold individuals accountable, prosecutors first need to know the cast of characters involved in any misconduct. To that end, today I am directing the department to restore prior guidance making clear that to be eligible for any cooperation credit, companies must provide the department with all non-privileged information about individuals involved in or responsible for the misconduct at issue. To be clear, a company must identify all individuals involved in the misconduct, regardless of their position, status or seniority."

News: Deputy Attorney General Lisa O. Monaco Gives Keynote Address at ABA's 36th National Institute on White Collar Crime

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Discuss history of corporate business crime enforcement
Reference No:- TGS03309637

Expected delivery within 24 Hours