Discussion: Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Arkansas
Review the cases of Miller v. Alabama and Jackson v. Arkansas (2012). Discuss these two cases as a differential way of dealing with juveniles being tried and sentenced as adults but not subject to all the rules of adult sentencing laws. justify your ideas and responses by citing appropriate examples from references within the texts, Web sites, and other resources or apply examples from personal experience
Obviously, both of these cases fell under the Capital Murder statutes of both states. Differentiate the peacemaking philosophy and deontological philosophy in the context of capital murder sentencing for juveniles?
What would be the difference between the utilitarian and the deontological philosophies of the two cases reviewed?
Use references/cite sources