Assignment:
Topic of the paper:
The policy can be any policy that relates to reward electric cars like TESLA
It's about the government attitude to support renewable energy
For instance, different countries and different states in US all have different policies about rewarding people who are buying electric cars like TESLA, and also there are policies supporting companies like TESLA to build electric cars.
The main point is about reward for renewable energy, not car, TESLA is just my favourite brand and I prefer to use it as an example if possible
We need specific policies example and statistics to back up and please cite all the information you find through online
First, find a successful public policy that interests you and that you would like to see adopted, whether in the United States or in an imaginary perfect country.
Even though you agree with this policy, the first part of the paper should be a persuasive argument that convinces the reader to come to the opposite conclusion from the one you have drawn. In other words, you should write the op-ed that someone who thinks this idea will not work would send to the New York Times.
Assume the author is a logical and thoughtful person who truly wants to improve the situation described in the article, but who does not agree with this particular solution. That person is, of course, also brilliant and an excellent writer. In other words, put yourself in that person's shoes and show how you can be empathetic. Consider that person's moral framework and address your arguments to him or her.
This will take research, both because you will need to marshal ideas for this side of the argument that is not natural to you and because you will need facts and data to back up your argument. Don't forget to explore the assumptions on both sides of the argument. If you know someone who disagrees with you, you can use that person's "expertise" as part of your research.
As part of your persuasive argument, you may want to create an infographic that can persuade readers that this side of the argument is the better one.