Review the case study and respond the following:
1. Suppose that the matter has been brought to arbitration. What are relevant facts that you would use if you were the arbitrator hearing this case?
2. If you were the arbitrator, in whose favor would you rule?
3. Did Ricardo adequately consult before reaching a decision?
4. Is there evidence of gender bias?
5. Was Stubbs given adequate notice?
6. Was the department's offer to pay Stubbs her unemployment benefits and insurance costs a collegial gesture, or should the arbitrator interpret the offer as an admission of wrongdoing 13y the university?
Attachment:- Case study.rar