Develop a list of generic evaluation criteria that critique


Scenario

In this assignment, you will undertake two distinct tasks divided as Part A and Part B.

First, you will develop a list of generic evaluation criteria that critique valid practices when developing, or constructing, Charts, Tables and Graphs (i.e. visualisations), i.e. Part A.

Second, you will use the criteria you have just developed to evaluate the suitability of the Charts, Tables and Graphs (i.e. visualisations) utilised in a publically available report of your choice (subject to the conditions listed later in this document) i.e. Part B.

Requirements

Part A: Develop Evaluation Criteria

Your evaluation criteria need to be objective, in that they stipulate the rules you would use in establishing whether a Chart, Table or Graph utilised in your selected Report, is appropriate for the data being presented. You need to make sure that each of your criterion is written in such a manner that a reasonable person can readily understand, or appreciate, the message being conveyed. You are expected to address approximately 20 criteria.

You should also group your criteria by visualisation type. For example, you might choose "Common", "Chart", "Table" and "Graph", or some other suitable grouping. You are not restricted to these specific headings. It's also important that you number each separate criterion as you will need to refer to its specific number when undertaking Task 2.

An example of an appropriate criterion:
Line Charts should be used when analysing trends over time. To be effective, the time series should be placed on the x-axis with the measure on the y-axis.

An example of an unacceptable criterion:
Line Charts should have nice colours.
This last example fails on two counts: it has an inadequate description (or explanation); and, it is subjective (i.e. the authors opinion) - your criteria need to be objective.

Part B: Report Evaluation

Select 12 to 15 diverse Charts, Tables or Graphs from your chosen Report (but not including any "Infographics") and evaluate these visualisations using your criterion developed in Part A. It would not be unusual for an individual visualisation from your report to refer to multiple criteria. Further, any given visualisation you select may conform to some of your criterion but be in contravention of others, and this would need to be reported.

It is expected that each of your criterion would be used at least once when evaluating your chosen Charts, Tables or Graphs.
Note: When evaluating the report, include an image of the Charts, Tables and Graphs you have selected and make sure you associate them back to a specific criterion by using the criterion number you utilised in Part A.

Guidelines

1. The following word counts should be used as a guide for this assessment.

Criteria: Qty 20 with 20 to 30 words in each (i.e. 400 to 600 words)

Evaluation: Qty 12 with 100 to 120 words in each (i.e. 1200 to 1440 words), or
Qty 15 with 100 to 120 words in each (i.e. 1500 to 1800 words)

Therefore, using the above guidelines, your assignment should be no less than 1600 words and no more than 2400 words (i.e. 2000 words plus or minus 20%)

2. For this assignment, we are only interested in the Charts, Tables and Graphs contained in your selected published report but do not include any items commonly known as "Infographics".

Attachment:- NAB.pdf

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Develop a list of generic evaluation criteria that critique
Reference No:- TGS02389242

Expected delivery within 24 Hours