Develop a forecasting model justify its selection over


Southwestern University (SWU), a large state college in Stephenville, Texas, 30 miles southwest of the Dallas/Fort Worth metroplex, enrolls close to 20,000 students. In a typical town-gown relationship, the school is a dominant force in the small city, with more students during fall and spring than permanent residents.

A longtime football powerhouse, SWU is a member of the Big Eleven conference and is usually in the top 20 in college football rankings. To bolster its chances of reaching the elusive and long-desired number-one ranking, in 2005 SWU hired the legendary Bo Pitterno as its head coach. Although the number-one ranking remained out of reach, attendance at the five Saturday home games each year increased. Prior to Pitterno's arrival, attendance generally averaged 25,000 to 29,000 per game. Season ticket sales bumped up by 10,000 just with the announcement of the new coach's arrival. Stephenville and SWU were ready to move to the big time!

The immediate issue facing SWU, however, was not NCAA ranking. It was capacity. The existing SWU stadium, built in 1953, has seating for 54,000 fans. The following table indicates attendance at each game for the past six years.

One of Pitterno's demands upon joining SWUhad been a stadium expansion, or possibly even a new stadium. With attendance increasing, SWU administrators began to face the issue head on. Pitterno had wanteddormitoriessolely for his atheletes in the stadium as additional feature of any expansion.

SWU's president Marty Starr, decidedit was time for his vice presidentof development to forecast when the existing stadium would "max-out". He also sought a revenue projection, assuming an average ticket price of $20in 2011 and a 5% increase each year in the future prices.

Southwestern University Football Game Attendance, 2005-2010


2005
2006 2007
GAME ATTENDEES OPPONENT ATTENDEES OPPONENT ATTENDEES OPPONENT
1 34,200 Baylor 36,000 Oklahoma 35,900 TCU
2* 39,800 Texas 40,200 Nebraska 46,500 Texas Tech
3 38,200 LSU 39,100 UCLA 43,100 Alska
4** 26,900 Arkansas 25,300 Nevada 27,900 Arizona
5 35,100 USC 36,200 Ohio State 39,200 Rice


2008 2009 2010
GAME ATTENDEES OPPONENT ATTENDEES OPPONENT ATTENDEES OPPONENT
1 41,900 Arkansas 42,500 Indiana  46,900 LSU
2* 46,100 Missouri 48,200 North Texas 50,100 Texas
3 43,900 Florida 44,200 Texas A&M 45,900 Prairie View A&M
4** 30,100 Miami 33,900 Southern 36,300 Montana
5 40,500 Duke 47,800 Oklahoma 49,900 Arizona State

Discussion Questions:

1. Develop a forecasting model, justify its selection over other techniques, and project attendance through 2012.

2. What revenues are to be expected in 2011 and 2012?

3. Discuss the school's options.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Mathematics: Develop a forecasting model justify its selection over
Reference No:- TGS01413980

Expected delivery within 24 Hours