Problem:
In 1932, the Public Health Service, working with the Tuskegee Institute, began a study to record the natural history of syphilis in hopes of justifying treatment programs for blacks. It was called the "Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male." The study initially involved 600 black men - 399 with syphilis, 201 who did not have the disease. Although originally projected to last 6 months, the study went on for 40 years. The study was conducted without the benefit of patients' informed consent.
In 2003, Havasupai Tribe members in Arizona discovered that their DNA samples, collected for genetic studies on type II diabetes, had been used for studies on schizophrenia, migration, and inbreeding without their approval. The resulting lawsuit brought by the Havasupai reached a settlement in April 2010 in which tribe members received monetary compensation and the return of DNA samples (Garrison & Cho, 2013).
Describe how IRB protects human research participants. Describe the violations of the principles of the ethical practice of public health in the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and Havasupai "Diabetes Study." Be sure to address the following questions in alignment with the Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the Havasupai "Diabetes Study". What is the role of an Institutional Review Board (IRB)? What are the guidelines for informed consent? Need Assignment Help?