Denying preclusive effect of saudi judgment in united states


Assignment:

Compare the different results in Alfadda v. Fenn, 966 F. Supp. 1317 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (U.S. court found French judgment precluded U.S. proceedings) with Alesayi Beverage Corp. v. Canada Dry Beverage Corp, 947 F. Supp. 658 (S.D.N.Y. 1996), affd. 122 F.3d. 1055 (2nd Cir. 1997) (denying preclusive effect of Saudi judgment in United States). Why do parties initiate such parallel proceedings?

Your answer must be typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format and also include references.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Denying preclusive effect of saudi judgment in united states
Reference No:- TGS01982624

Expected delivery within 24 Hours