Problem:
Think about the various forms of the state of nature and the social contract presented by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau.
Which do you agree with most? Why? Defend your claims with evidence and good reasons.
Is the world a cold cruel and indifferent place, or is it a good and meaningful place?
Are people basically selfish and insensitive or are they basically unselfish and caring?
Does civilization corrupt human nature (Rousseau) or does it save us from descending into savagery (Hobbes), or is there a middle-road approach (Locke)?
Why is it that in the 'civilized ' world we need police, business contracts, laws and locked-doors to protect ourselves from exploitation and violence, but in 'primitive' or nonindustrial societies they don't need any of these things to live in peace?
Cite evidence and good reasons in support of your claims. Makes sure you answer each question above.
Attachment:- Discussion Question.rar