Debate whether or not coca-cola is deliberately trying to


VitaminWater—sounds healthy, right? Although VitaminWater does have vitamins, it also has 33 grams—that’s 2 heaping tablespoons—of sugar, making it not much better than a soda. VitaminWater, owned by Coca-Cola, has been under fire from the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a consumer-advocacy group that fights for safer, more nutritious foods. The CSPI filed a class-action lawsuit against Coca-Cola, claiming names for VitaminWater flavors such as “endurance peach mango” and “focus kiwi strawberry” are misleading for two reasons: (1) the drinks contain 0 to 1 percent juice and (2) words like “endurance,” “focus,” “defense,” “rescue,” and “energy” imply health benefits. Coca-Cola’s defense was that reasonable consumers would not be misled into believing that VitaminWater is healthy for them.

1. Debate whether or not Coca-Cola is deliberately trying to deceive consumers into believing that VitaminWater is a healthy alternative to soda.

2. Find two other examples of brands that use names, words, colors, package shapes, or other elements to convey potentially deceptive meanings to consumers.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Financial Management: Debate whether or not coca-cola is deliberately trying to
Reference No:- TGS02306645

Expected delivery within 24 Hours