Pay for performance has been utilized for many years, however it is growing in popularity as a cost controlling measure. Critics argue that pay for performance results in a physician's unwillingness to treat complicated or difficult cases.
Proponents argue that paying for performance will increase quality and result in a higher patient satisfaction.
In this discussion, highlight the pros and cons to pay for performance as a cost saving technique. Additionally, summarize recent studies to determine if physician-based pay for performance is truly delivering the promised cost savings.
- 2 to 3 pages not including the cover page and references.
- Provide in text citation and at least 3 updated articles.
- Follow APA style.