Critical evaluation on research via annotated bibliography


For this assignment you will review current research and provide a critical evaluation on that research through an annotated bibliography. An annotated bibliography is a brief summary and analysis of the journal article reviewed. For more information on annotated bibliographies please visit Purdue’s OWL:

https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/614/01/

A total of four annotated bibliographies are to be submitted (not to exceed one page each). The articles must come from nursing scholarly literature and may not be older than 5 years since publication. Please note that the articles must be research based and reflect a quantitative methodology (review our reading assignments). Web pages, magazines, textbooks, and other books are not acceptable.

Please include these articles as well as others:

Carter, V. L., PhD.,Tippett, F., PhD., Anderson, D. L., PhD., &Tameru, B., PhD. (2010). Increasing prostate cancer screening among African American men. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 21(3), 91-106. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/747083760?accountid=87314

Jones, R. A., Steeves, R., & Williams, I. (2010). Family and friend interactions among African-American men deciding whether or not to have a prostate cancer screening. Urologic Nursing, 30(3), 189-93, 166. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/577308429?accountid=87314

Oliver, J. S., Grindel, C. G., DeCoster, J., Ford, C. D., & Martin, M. Y. (2011). Benefits, Barriers, Sources of Influence, and Prostate Cancer Screening Among Rural Men. Public Health Nursing, 28(6), 515-522. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1446.2011.00956.x

Each annotation must address the following critical elements:

• Explanation of the main purpose and scope of the cited work

• Brief description of the research conducted

• Value and significance of the work (e.g., study’s findings, scope of the research project) as a contribution to the subject under consideration

• Possible shortcomings or bias in the work

• Conclusions or observations reached by the author

• Summary as to why this research lends evidence to support the potential problem identified specific to your role option.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Other Subject: Critical evaluation on research via annotated bibliography
Reference No:- TGS01426938

Expected delivery within 24 Hours