Conflicting goals of retribution


Assignment:

Those charged with sentencing embraces a number of philosophies to sometimes satisfy the seemingly conflicting goals of retribution, incapacitation, deterrence, rehabilitation, and restoration. The means to accomplish those tasks have traditionally been comprised of fines, probation, imprisonment, and death. To adapt to the financial, social, and international pressures, the criminal justice system has experimented with mandatory, indeterminate, and structured sentencing. However, each offender-based alternative must be viewed with in the light of its impact on the recidivism, victims, and society at-large.

Beginning with the material conveyed in the assigned reading and presentation, select two scholarly articles from the university criminal justice databases, and integrate those resources to discuss the practical implications of alternative and innovative sentencing options. Finally, integrate within your discussion the impact of a Judeo-Christian viewpoint on the viability of such new sentencing options.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: Conflicting goals of retribution
Reference No:- TGS01856106

Now Priced at $30 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)