1. Compare Watson and Arneson's arguments.
Are they consistently applying consequentialist or deontological moral reasoning?
Given what you read in this and the previous module, which moral principle should we apply in this case? Using real-world examples, and defend your answer
2. post your response to the following discussion question.
Mrs. Franklin, an 81-year-old Alzheimer's patient hospitalized under your care, has been asked to participate in a clinical trial testing a new drug designed to help improve memory. You were present when the clinical investigator obtained a signed informed consent from Mrs. Franklin a few days ago. However, when you visit Mrs. Franklin today and ask her if she is ready to begin the study tomorrow, she looks at you blankly and seems to have no idea what you are talking about. What should you do? Explain your reasoning?
Reflection Essay 1 Please use using APA format
Beginning with the two opposing viewpoints on the topic of human experimentation and international clinical trials explained in the text, complete and submit a short (750- to 1000-word) reflective research project in which you clearly state and defend a thesis on the topic.
Your essay should make good use of the two articles from the text as well as two (2) of the articles from additional resources you were assigned in this module. The position you defend should be informed by a particular moral principle (moral principles were introduced in Module 1) and should make meaningful reference to the chapters from the textbook and the supplemental resources as mentioned above.
You may also use additional academic resources. Be sure to cite all outside sources (including textbook readings, supplemental articles, and any additional research) used in developing your argument, using APA format.
Finally, remember that while the empirical data and research are certainly relevant and important in this area, the thesis that you defend and the argument you submit are not empirical; you are developing and defending a normative argument about what is the morally correct position in this case.