Compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the Durkheimian and Weberian theories of legal change. Think about and include answers for the following the following issues: How adequate are their descriptions of the legal systems they analyze? What variables do theyuse to account for the emergence of modern legal systems? What evidence did they use tosupport or refute their arguments? Conclude your essay with a concise discussion that tellswhich theorist offers the better explanation of legal change. Justify your choice.