Question: MINICASE: ACCT - 09 BUSINESS ETHICS PROGRAM? 1992 Arthur Andersen & Co, SC.
Damage Expense Topic:
Violations of Internal Control Characters: Chris, New Distribution Supervisor at a large candy manufacturer Bob, Inventory Control Manager, Chris's immediate boss Chris has been recently hired as the Distribution Supervisor for an international candy company. The plant is in a rural area and is about to begin a major expansion that will triple its capacity. The company has generous benefits and has paid all moving expenses for Chris and his family. During the move, however, the movers damaged a large piece of oak furniture. Chris has contacted the moving company. The insurance is by the pound and would cover only a small part of the worth of the item. Chris has explained this to the moving company, but it refuses to reimburse him for the item's value. Chris approaches his supervisor, Bob, about the problem. Chris has been on the job about a month and enjoys the partnership they have developed to date. Chris had originally interviewed with Bob, and Bob's recommendation had been a major factor in Chris's getting the job. Chris has found the types of challenges he was looking for in a new position and is already becoming a major player in planning for the new expansion. Bob tells Chris that he does not think he can make thing to persuade the moving company to reimburse Chris and suggests that Chris pad his next few expense reports to cover the cost. Chris is surprised at Bob's suggestion, because thus far Bob has dealt with him in a very evenhanded manner and has appeared to have strong business ethical standards.
Author: Originally developed by Michael Forget, graduate student at Washington University, as a class project in "Ethical Decision Making." Edited and submitted by Dr. Raymond L. Hilgert, Professor of Management and Industrial Relations, Washington
Could you please help me to find solution to this case
1. State the facts
2. Some alternatives that Chirs could take with discuss and mention the pro and con of these alternative
3. Relative question to this case
4. Some recommendation