Case study-making norwich tools lathe investment decision


Case Study-Making Norwich Tool's Lathe Investment Decision

Norwich Tool, a large machine shop, is considering replacing one of its lathes with either of two new lathes—lathe A or lathe B. Lathe A is a highly automated, computer-controlled lathe; lathe B is a less expensive lathe that uses standard technology. To analyze these alternatives, Mario Jackson, a financial analyst, prepared estimates of the initial investment and incremental (relevant) cash inflows associated with each lathe. These are shown in the following table.

                             Lathe A      Lathe B
Initial investment (CFo)    $660,000     $360,000

Year (t)                     Cash inflows (CFt)

1                           $128,000     $88,000
2                            182,000     120,000
3                            166,000      96,000
4                            168,000      86,000
5                            450,000     207,000

Note that Mario plans to analyze both lathes over a 5-year period. At the end of that time, the lathes would be sold, thus accounting for the large fifth-year cash inflows.

One of Mario's dilemmas centered on the risk of the two lathes. He believes that although the two lathes are equally risky, lathe A has a much higher chance of breakdown and repair because of its sophisticated and not fully proven solid-state electronic technology. Mario is unable to quantify this possibility effectively, so he decides to apply the firm's 13% cost of capital when analyzing the lathes. Norwich Tool requires all projects to have a maximum payback period of 4.0 years.

TO DO:

Question 1: Use the payback period to assess the acceptability and relative ranking of each lathe.

Question 2: Assuming equal risk, use the following sophisticated capital budgeting techniques to assess the acceptability and relative ranking of each lathe:

(A) Net present value (NPV).
(B) Internal rate of return (IRR).

Question 3: Summarize the preferences indicated by the techniques used in parts a and b, and indicate which lathe you recommend, if either, (1) if the firm has unlim-ited funds and (2) if the firm has capital rationing.

Question 4: Repeat part b assuming that Mario decides that because of its greater risk, lathe A's cash inflows should be evaluated by using a 15% cost of capital.

Question 5: What effect, if any, does recognition of lathe A's greater risk in part d have on your recommendation in part c?

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Microeconomics: Case study-making norwich tools lathe investment decision
Reference No:- TGS01744962

Now Priced at $25 (50% Discount)

Recommended (90%)

Rated (4.3/5)