Case study - the boeing dreamliner and jim mcnerney use


Paper -

Case Study - The Boeing Dreamliner and Jim McNerney

The case is based on Shenhar, A.J. Holzmann, B. Melamed &Y. Zhao. (2016). The challenge of innovation in highly complex projects: What can we learn from Boeing's Dreamliner experience? Project Management Journal, Vol. 47, No. 2; 62-78.

Title Page - Leadership Implications in Complex Projects: The Boeing Dreamliner

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

Identification of the Problem

  • Use the problems assigned for each paper
  • Introduces the case (one paragraph) clearly identifies the problem that will be analyzed in the paper (one to two paragraphs).
  • Do not insert your analysis of the project in this section.

Problem Areas

  • Planning Project Communication
  • Stakeholder Identification and Analysis
  • Stakeholder Communications

Analysis of the Situation

  • What mechanisms/management theories and class readings to analyze the problems that were identified; look for the most relevant and important material to support your analysis of a given problem
  • Sufficiently and thoroughly analyze each of the problems described in your problem identification section.
  • Present examples found in the case that supports your argument.
  • Support your analysis by citing and briefly explaining relevant class readings

Do not give an overview or description of the case

Do not repeat substantial amounts of the case details.

Recommendations-

  • Flow logically from your analysis
  • Are appropriate for the situation
  • Address each problem covered in your analysis

Cite assigned readings to support your recommendations.

Reference Page

  • In text citation
  • Page numbers
  • 8 resources counting the case as one.

No Of Pages: 10 - 8 Page paper, 1 Title Page and 1 Reference Page.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Project Management: Case study - the boeing dreamliner and jim mcnerney use
Reference No:- TGS02680676

Now Priced at $70 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)