Case- hollinger v sifers --- sw2d --- 2003 wl 22997218 ct


Case- Hollinger v. Sifers, --- S.W.2d --- (2003 WL 22997218, Ct. App., Mo., 2003)

Aaron is a physician in Arizona and is not licensed to practice medicine in California. Leslie, a California resident, saw a television interview with Aaron and contacted his office in Arizona about the surgical procedure, which was the subject of the television interview. Aaron subsequently performed the surgery on Leslie in Arizona. The surgery resulted in significant complications and Leslie sued Aaron in California state court for malpractice together with other torts. Personal service of process was obtained upon Aaron in Arizona under California's long-arm statute. Aaron ignored the summons and complaint, choosing not to defend the action. Leslie was awarded $3,000,000, by the California court. She now seeks to enforce the judgment, what would you suggest Aaron argue to avoid payment?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Case- hollinger v sifers --- sw2d --- 2003 wl 22997218 ct
Reference No:- TGS01051429

Expected delivery within 24 Hours