Carrying no spare parts would be the best strategy for what


A public utility intends to buy a turbine as part of an expansion plan and must now decide on the number of spare parts to order. One part, no. X135, can be purchased for $80 each. Carrying and disposal costs are estimated to be 100 percent of the purchase price over the life of the turbine. A stockout would cost roughly $105,000 due to downtime, ordering, and “special purchase” factors. Historical records based on the performance of similar equipment operating under similar conditions suggest that demand for spare parts will tend to approximate a Poisson distribution with a mean of 4.2 parts for the useful life of the turbine.

Carrying no spare parts would be the best strategy for what range of shortage cost?

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Strategic Management: Carrying no spare parts would be the best strategy for what
Reference No:- TGS02522324

Expected delivery within 24 Hours