Problem
Review the resources regarding the Liebeck v. McDonald's case. Think about what you learned about torts in this unit. If you were a member of the jury, would you have decided on Liebeck's or McDonald's? Be sure to support your position with citations to authority and the elements of negligence.
In response to your peers, consider your peers' responses. If they disagree with your answer, consider the factual assumptions they have made, which form the foundation of their opinion. Can you challenge those assumptions while furthering your discussion? If your responses are similar, consider posing a hypothetical question to test your peer's conclusions.
Whether you are an attorney arguing in court or a business stakeholder pitching to shareholders or a potential client, adding support for your argument from appropriate resources strengthens your content. For this problem, be sure to include a citation to a proper source supporting your point. (HINT: Your textbook is a great source!)