Problem
Crenshaw argues that the best way to try to deal with inequalities is by taking a bottom-up approach and helping those for whom it can be said "where I enter, we all enter". Rawls argues that the best way to try to deal with inequalities is to reason from a veil of ignorance, where one does not know any particulars about oneself. Briefly discuss how each approach is meant to work, according to these authors. In your opinion, which approach is best? Or should both be used? Why?