Case Problem:
Poor Sarah Jane not only had a short-lived marriage but found out that her supposedly $45,000 ring was worth only half that amount. It seems that the jeweler had misrepresented to her now ex-husband. Sarah Jane now brings an action against the jeweler for breach of an express warranty. Can she sue even though she was not the purchaser or, in fact, any purchaser? [ Schaurer v. Mandarin Gems of California, Inc., 125 Cal. Rptr. 4th 949 (2005).]
Your answer must be, typed, double-spaced, Times New Roman font (size 12), one-inch margins on all sides, APA format and also include references.