Discuss the below:
sHRA 360
Choose one of the job evaluation techniques described in the textbook. Discuss the pros and cons of that technique in your own words. How would you envision using that technique to establish comparable worthfor your own job (or a job with which you are very familiar)?Specifically:
What pros or cons would you add to your peers' discussions of the job evaluation technique they chose?
Do you think your peers were realistic in their discussion of how that technique could be used to evaluate their jobs? Why or why not? What might be a better job evaluation technique?
HRA 498
Evaluating (quantitatively and qualitatively) training and development activities should be an important part of strategic activities withinorganizations. Discuss the training evaluation process, starting with the concept of a training needs analysis, to a discussion of the importance of transfer of training, to a discussion of the ways that the benefits can be computed (cost-benefit analysis, return-on investment analysis and benchmarking). Also, briefly discuss the benefits (study-wise) of some of the more common training approaches (lectures, intercultural competence training, succession planning, on-the-job training, and online training approaches). Do they work or not? (You might need to dig a bit to find data about these.)Your initial response should not consist solely of opinion statements, but be supported by factual information. As references, you may use your textbook or other articles and resources. Remember to use APA format for in-text reference citations.In your responses to classmates, you may discuss what you learned from their posts, what surprised you about their posts, and/or how their posts relate to things that you haveread about or experienced in your own life.
PSY 338
Post a well-considered opinion of the BEST way to measure performance and the WORST way to measure performance. Your chapter outlined a great number of ways. Explain why you think the BEST is good, andwhy you think the WORST is bad. Cite at least one objectively verifiable FACT (a statistic is best) in your response. Do not use Wikipedia as the source for this. Do, however, cite your source in APA format. At the bottom of your post include the full reference citation, just as you would on the reference page of an APA-formatted paper.