Behavioral implications of different organizational designs


This question focuses on the importance of organizational structure and its possible impact on employees. After finishing with the Background page and readings, go to the following interview with Rosabeth Moss Kanter, who is a renowned Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, and an influential business advisor. Among other things, in this interview she talks about the evolution of changes in organizational structure in the past decades, and the link to employees' well-being and functioning.

Use the articles illustrated to aid in the response:

Puffer, S. (2004) Changing organizational structures: An interview with Rosabeth Moss Kanter. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2). (Attached)

Buhler, P. M. (2011). Changing organizational structures and their impact on managers. Supervision, 72(2), 24-26. (Attached)

1) An organization's structure can have significant effects on its members. What might those effects be? Analyze the behavioral implications of different organizational designs and use at least two examples, Quicken Loans being one of them.

2) Is it possible to generalize and say that a certain structure is better than others? That is, is there a structure that is superior in terms of its effects on its members? Take a stand and defend your comments with references to the concepts in the readings in this module and any previous modules that you find relevant. Demonstrate that you have read, understood, and can apply the background materials by citing them in support of your analysis.

Solution Preview :

Prepared by a verified Expert
Business Law and Ethics: Behavioral implications of different organizational designs
Reference No:- TGS01442596

Now Priced at $20 (50% Discount)

Recommended (94%)

Rated (4.6/5)