Bbal401 company law group assignment and presentation


Company law Group Assignment and Presentation -

Learning Outcomes: On successful completion of this assignment, students will be able to:

  • Recognise the laws relating to companies in Australia; and
  • Examine the duties, rights and responsibilities of company officers

Case Options -

1. Forrest v ASIC (2014)

2. ASIC v Citigroup (2007)

3. Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Sino Australia Oil and Gas Limited (in liq) v Sino Australia Oil and Gas Limited (in liq) [2016] FCA 934 (11 August 2016)

4. Stimpson, in the matter of Eagle Boys Dial-A-Pizza Australia Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) v Eagle Boys Dial-A-Pizza Australia Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2016] FCA 935 (11 August 2016)

5. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v CME Capital Australia Pty Ltd, in the matter of CME Capital Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 544 (16 May 2016)

6. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bilkurra Investments Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 371 (15 April 2016)

7. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Astra Resources PLC [2015] FCA 759 (24 July 2015)

8. ASIC v Soust (2010)

9. North v Marra Developments Ltd (1981)

10. Fame Decorator Agencies Pty Ltd v Jeffries Industries Ltd (1998)

11. Gambotto v WCP Ltd (1995)

12. Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1990)

13. Permanent Trustee Australia Ltd (as Trustee of Advance Property Fund) v Stout and Others (1999)

14. Nassar v Innovative Precasters Group Pty Ltd (2009)

15. McGellin v Mount King Mining NL (1998)

16. Beck v Weinstock (2013)

17. Kinsela v Russell Kinsela Pty Ltd (in liq) (1986)

18. ASIC v Hellicar (2012)

19. ASIC v Lindberg (2012)

20. Shafron v ASIC (2012)

21. ASIC v Healey (2011)

22. Vines v ASIC (2006)

23. ASIC v Adler (2002)

24. Brunninghausen v Glavanics(1999)

25. ASIC v Rich (2003)

26. ASIC v Parker (2003)

27. ASIC v Loiterton (2004)

28. ASIC v PFS Business Development Group Pty Ltd (2006)

29. Hall v Poolman (2007)

30. ASIC v Australian Investors Forum Pty Ltd (No. 2) (2005)

31. State of South Australia v Marcus Clark (1996)

32. ASIC v Vizard (2005)

33. ASIC v McDonald (No.11) (2009)

34. ASIC v NRMA (2002)

35. ASIC v Plymin (2003)

36. ASIC v Cyclone Magnetic Engines Inc (2010)

37. ASC v MacLeod (2000)

38. Biodiesel Producers Ltd v Stewart (2007)

39. AXA Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd v Direct Share Purchasing Corporation Pty Ltd (2009)

40. Wilson v Manna Hill Mining Corporation Pty Ltd (2004)

41. Wenzel v ASX Ltd (2002)

42. R v Rivkin (2004)

43. Kwok v R (2007)

44. Isak Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd v Faress (2003)

45. Capricornia Credit Union Ltd v ASIC (2007)

Written Assignment:

Identify the facts of the case.

Explain the relevant law relating to the case.

Discuss the legal arguments raised by the parties in case.

Summarise the judgement of the case.

Illustrate the role, purpose and scope of the relevant court, or tribunal.

Request for Solution File

Ask an Expert for Answer!!
Business Law and Ethics: Bbal401 company law group assignment and presentation
Reference No:- TGS02191841

Expected delivery within 24 Hours